One price buys flexibility, the other buys a delivery process.
TL;DR
Airtable Team is $20 per collaborator per month billed annually ($24 monthly) and gives a relational database with views, interfaces and automations. Jira lists Standard at $7.91 per user per month and Premium at $14.54, keeps a free plan for up to 10 users, and is built around issues, sprints and boards. Airtable wins when work items are heterogeneous records; Jira wins when the work is delivery tracked through a backlog.
Airtable sells a database that teams reshape: Team at $20 per collaborator per month billed annually, Business at $45, Enterprise Scale quoted. Team carries 50,000 records per base, 25,000 automation runs per month and 100,000 API calls per month, and only collaborators with edit rights are billed. Its project views, interfaces and automations handle intake forms, roadmaps and trackers without prescribing how work should run.
Jira prices per user: Standard at $7.91 per user per month, Premium at $14.54, and an Enterprise edition that Atlassian quotes on annual subscriptions only. The free plan covers up to 10 users with 150 automation steps per subscription per month; Standard raises that to 400 automation steps per user per month and Premium to 750. Boards, backlog, sprints, releases and workflows are the core objects, and Jira's own positioning describes teams and AI agents planning and delivering together.
| Feature | Airtable | Jira |
|---|---|---|
| Starting price | Team $20 per collaborator per month billed annually ($24 monthly) | Standard $7.91 per user per month |
| Free tier | Free for up to five collaborators with edit permissions | Free for up to 10 users per site |
| Free tier automation | Automation runs metered on paid workspaces | 150 automation steps per subscription per month |
| Next tier | Business $45 per collaborator per month ($54 monthly) | Premium $14.54 per user per month, 750 automation steps per user per month |
| Top tier | Enterprise Scale, custom price | Enterprise, quoted by Atlassian on annual subscriptions |
| Volume pricing | Read-only collaborators, form respondents and share links are never billed | Standard falls to $7.65 per user at 101-250 users |
| Paid allowances | 50,000 records per base, 25,000 automation runs and 100,000 API calls per month on Team | 400 automation steps per user per month on Standard |
| Core objects | Tables, views, interfaces, forms and automations | Issues, boards, backlogs, sprints, releases and workflows |
| Platform | Browser-based, with iOS and Android apps | Browser-based, with iOS and Android apps |
| Offline editing | No offline editing in the browser | No offline editing in the browser |
Pick Airtable if
Requests, vendors, content, research and inventory are records rather than tickets, and Airtable lets each team model them with its own fields and views while automations carry the routine steps. Jira would be an expensive way to store rows that never need a sprint.
Pick Jira if
Scrum and Kanban boards, sprint reporting, release tracks and per-site automation are already wired into the process, and at $7.91 per user per month the standard plan undercuts Airtable's Team rate by more than half. Airtable is the better buy only for groups that want to design the workflow themselves.
We collected no independent reviews, ratings or user quotations for Airtable or Jira in this run. Pricing and limits above come from airtable.com, support.airtable.com and Atlassian's own Jira pricing pages; figures for Premium reflect the tiers Atlassian publishes for its licensing pages.
At list rates yes: Jira Standard is $7.91 per user per month and Airtable Team is $20 per collaborator per month billed annually. The gap narrows if a team needs Airtable's free read-only seats or Jira's Premium at $14.54 with its automation and SLA allowances.
It can, through custom fields and workflow states, but its core objects are issues, sprints and releases. Teams tracking vendors, content or research usually end up bending Jira's model rather than using it directly.
Jira counts automation steps: 150 per subscription per month on Free, 400 per user per month on Standard, 750 on Premium. Airtable counts automation runs per workspace, listed at 25,000 per month on Team.
Both are delivered through the browser and neither supports offline editing there; each vendor offers iOS and Android apps for mobile access.
Ten Jira users fit inside the free plan, so the tracker costs nothing while the team is that size. Ten Airtable editors on Team cost $200 per month billed annually, although Airtable's free plan covers up to five editors.
Spot an outdated price or feature? Let us know and we'll verify it.