← Heraldware
AWSvsSupabase

TL;DR

AWS rents you the parts: t4g.micro at $0.0084/hr in us-east-1, per-second billing, and a managed database, storage, auth and functions you switch on and pay for individually inside a 240-service account. Supabase sells the assembled thing: a Postgres database with auth, storage, realtime, edge functions and row-level security, free at $0 for 500MB of data and 50,000 monthly active users, $25/mo on Pro for 8GB per project plus $10 of compute credit, and $599/mo on Team for SOC 2 and ISO 27001. Supabase is a product you buy; AWS is a kit you build from. Start on Supabase if the app is a Postgres-shaped product with users, and use AWS when the data layer is one part of a larger system.

Supabase starts from Postgres and wraps the rest around it. The free tier runs a 500MB database on shared CPU with 500MB of RAM, 50,000 monthly active users, 5GB of egress, 1GB of file storage, two active projects and unlimited API requests, with the caveat that free projects pause after one week of inactivity. Pro is $25 per month per organization and includes 8GB of disk per project ($0.125/GB after that), $10 of compute credit covering one Micro instance, 100,000 monthly active users then $0.00325 each, 250GB of egress then $0.09 per GB, email support and daily backups retained for seven days. Team is $599/mo and adds SOC 2 and ISO 27001, dashboard SSO, priority support with SLAs and 14-day backups; Enterprise is quoted, with 24x7 support and AWS PrivateLink. Billing is per organization, and each project carries its own compute instance on top of the plan.

The comparison turns on how much of the backend you want to own. Supabase gives you the schema, the API, the auth rules and the storage bucket as one product with one invoice, and its own documentation shows the arithmetic plainly: a Pro organization running two Micro projects costs $25 plus $10 plus $10 minus the $10 credit, or $35 a month. AWS will produce the same capabilities only after you have chosen and wired together four separate services — which is exactly the work some teams want to avoid and exactly the control others need.

Pros & cons

👍 AWS Pros

  • Per-second billing from t4g.micro at $0.0084/hr in us-east-1, with 30-plus services free within monthly limits
  • Managed Postgres, object storage, auth, queues and functions available independently, each with its own scaling
  • Region, instance size, storage class and network isolation are configurable to the workload
  • Up to $200 in credits for new accounts and no term commitment on on-demand pricing

👎 AWS Cons

  • A working backend means four or five separate services, bills and dashboards instead of one
  • Estimating cost requires pricing each component, because the instance price is only part of the total
  • Backups, patching and connection pooling stay your problem unless you pay for each managed feature

👍 Supabase Pros

  • Free tier runs 500MB of Postgres, 50,000 monthly active users, 5GB egress and unlimited API requests
  • Pro at $25/mo includes 8GB of disk per project, $10 of compute credit and 100,000 monthly active users
  • Auth, storage, realtime, edge functions and row-level security ship as one product with one invoice
  • Every plan includes unlimited API requests, and paid projects are never paused for inactivity

👎 Supabase Cons

  • Free projects pause after one week of inactivity and are limited to two active projects
  • Team pricing jumps to $599/mo, so compliance features are not reachable at small-business prices
  • Compute is billed per project on top of the plan, and a second project doubles that line item

Side by side

FeatureAWSSupabase
Entry pricet4g.micro $0.0084/hr; t3.micro $0.0104/hr (us-east-1, Linux)Free: 500MB database, 50,000 monthly active users, $0
Main paid tierEach service metered separately as it is usedPro $25/mo: 8GB disk per project, $10 compute credit
DatabaseManaged Postgres priced by instance and storagePostgres included in every plan, 500MB free / 8GB on Pro
Auth and usersIdentity service metered per monthly active user50,000 MAU free, 100,000 on Pro then $0.00325 each
EgressCharged per GB by region5GB free, 250GB on Pro then $0.09 per GB
Inactivity ruleIdle resources keep billing until deletedFree projects pause after one week; paid projects keep running
Compliance tierRegion and account controls, enterprise agreements via salesTeam $599/mo with SOC 2, ISO 27001 and dashboard SSO
Scale ceiling240-plus services and no published maximumEnterprise plan with 24x7 support and AWS PrivateLink

Verdict

Pick AWS if

Choose AWS when Postgres is one piece of a larger system

If the application needs containers, background workers, private networking, several data stores or an existing cloud estate, AWS is the coherent home: the database joins the rest of the bill and scales on its own axis. The t4g.micro rate of $0.0084/hr shows how cheap the compute is; the real work is designing what surrounds it.

Pick Supabase if

Choose Supabase when the product is an app with users

For the typical CRUD product — accounts, rows, files, a client that talks to an API — Supabase removes the assembly work. Free covers 500MB and 50,000 monthly active users, and $25/mo on Pro buys 8GB of disk plus the compute credit that runs the database. You accept a fixed product boundary in exchange for not running infrastructure.

What the vendors say, and what we did not measure

No independent reviews, ratings or user quotes were collected for this page, so none appear above. Every figure and claim comes from the vendors' own pricing and product pages as retrieved for this article.

Who Should Use Which?

Use AWS if you...

  • The backend needs more than one data store or a queue in front of the database
  • You require private networking, specific regions or an enterprise agreement
  • An existing team already operates AWS and adding a second platform costs more than it saves

Use Supabase if you...

  • The app is a single Postgres database behind an API with user accounts
  • You want the free tier to cover the prototype without provisioning anything
  • Row-level security and generated APIs save you writing and reviewing that layer yourself

FAQ

Can Supabase run on AWS?

Supabase's own documentation describes its paid infrastructure on AWS, and Enterprise plans offer AWS PrivateLink. The choice is between operating the services yourself on an AWS account and buying Supabase's managed layer on top.

Which is cheaper for a side project?

Supabase's free tier holds 500MB of database, 50,000 monthly active users and 5GB of egress at $0. AWS stays cheap too — t4g.micro bills $0.0084/hr — but a full backend there usually means paying for a database, storage and egress separately, and free-tier limits apply per service.

What happens to a free Supabase project?

It pauses after one week of inactivity and the organization is limited to two active projects. Data is retained, and the project resumes when you return; this is the trade for hosting at no cost.

How does Supabase charge beyond the plan price?

Compute is billed per project on top of the subscription. Pro and Team include $10 of compute credit, enough for one Micro instance, so a single Pro project can sit at $25/mo while a second project adds its own compute line.

Does AWS have an equivalent to row-level security?

Yes, but as separate pieces: authorization rules live in your application or in an API gateway policy rather than in the database. Supabase puts those rules in Postgres policies that ship with the schema.

Spot an outdated price or feature? Let us know and we'll verify it.

Heraldware analysis engine

reviewed · data sourced from official product pages · sources: aws.amazon.com, supabase.com