← Heraldware
AWSvsVercel

TL;DR

AWS hands you infrastructure: t4g.micro at $0.0084/hr and t3.micro at $0.0104/hr in us-east-1, per-second billing, 240-plus services including managed databases, storage and identity, 30-plus of them free within monthly limits. Vercel hands you a deployment pipeline: Hobby at $0 with 1 million CDN requests and 100GB of transfer a month, Pro at $20/mo with 10 million requests and 1TB included, Enterprise quoted. Vercel is the better home for a front end with serverless functions behind it; AWS is where you go when the application needs a real server, a private network or a database you administer.

Vercel inverts that. The Hobby plan is free and includes a million CDN requests and 100GB of data transfer per month, three custom firewall rules, HTTPS certificates and the global delivery network, aimed at personal projects. Pro is $20 per month and raises the allowances to 10 million CDN requests (then from $2 per million) and 1TB of transfer (then from $0.15 per GB), with 40 custom firewall rules, 100 IP blocks and rate limiting starting at $0.50 per million allowed requests. Enterprise is sold through sales and adds custom allowances, up to a thousand firewall rules and contractual SLAs. BotID deep analysis on Pro bills $1 per thousand checks.

The two are not competitors so much as different layers that happen to both end in a URL. Vercel owns the front half — repository to CDN, with functions running near the user — while AWS owns whatever the functions call. Teams routinely deploy the interface to Vercel and keep the API, workers and database on AWS, which is usually cheaper and more honest than pretending one platform covers both.

Pros & cons

👍 AWS Pros

  • Per-second pricing from t4g.micro at $0.0084/hr, with the full instance and serverless catalogue available
  • Managed database, storage, queues and identity in one account alongside the compute
  • 30-plus services free within monthly limits and up to $200 in credits for new accounts
  • Region, networking and data residency chosen per workload rather than inherited from a plan

👎 AWS Cons

  • Nothing is wired together for you: pipelines, previews and rollouts are built and maintained in-house
  • The total depends on supporting resources, so instance prices alone understate the monthly figure
  • A front-end deployment that Vercel does in a Git hook takes a build service and a CDN configuration here

👍 Vercel Pros

  • Hobby is $0 with 1M CDN requests and 100GB of transfer per month, HTTPS included
  • Pro at $20/mo includes 10M CDN requests and 1TB of transfer, then from $2 per million and $0.15 per GB
  • Preview deployments, rollbacks and firewall rules ship with the plan instead of being assembled
  • Global delivery network handles caching and TLS without configuration on the project

👎 Vercel Cons

  • No virtual machines and no managed relational database to administer yourself
  • Usage above the Pro allowances bills on top: $0.50 per million rate-limited requests starts there too
  • Hobby is capped at three custom firewall rules and 100GB, which constrains a busy project

Side by side

FeatureAWSVercel
Entry pricet4g.micro $0.0084/hr (2 vCPU, 1 GiB, us-east-1 Linux)Hobby $0/mo: 1M CDN requests, 100GB transfer
Team tiert3.micro $0.0104/hr; every add-on metered separatelyPro $20/mo: 10M CDN requests, 1TB transfer included
Beyond allowanceDepends on the service used; each has its own meterCDN requests from $2 per million; transfer from $0.15 per GB
Web firewallSecurity group and WAF configured per resource3 custom rules on Hobby, 40 on Pro, 1,000 on Enterprise
Rate limitingProvided by services you add and pay for separately1M allowed requests included on Hobby, from $0.50 per million on Pro
DeploymentPipeline, previews and rollback built by your teamPreview deployments and rollbacks included with the plan
Top tierEnterprise agreements negotiated through salesEnterprise with custom allowances, SLAs and 1,000 firewall rules

Verdict

Pick AWS if

Choose AWS when the back end is the product

If the system runs workers, holds state, needs private networking or must sit in a particular region, AWS is the platform that will still fit in three years. The per-second entry price is trivial — t4g.micro at $0.0084/hr — and the discipline you need is forecasting the supporting services rather than the instance.

Pick Vercel if

Choose Vercel when deploying is the deliverable

For a front end, a documentation site, a store front or an app whose logic lives in functions, Vercel removes the parts of AWS nobody enjoys: build infrastructure, CDN configuration and certificate management. Hobby covers a million requests at $0, and $20/mo on Pro covers ten million, which is real traffic for most products.

What the vendors say, and what we did not measure

No independent reviews, ratings or user quotes were collected for this page, so none appear above. Every figure and claim comes from the vendors' own pricing and product pages as retrieved for this article.

Who Should Use Which?

Use AWS if you...

  • The application needs a managed database, message queue or long-running service
  • Data must stay inside a chosen region under your own account boundary
  • You already operate AWS and adding a front-end platform is optional rather than necessary

Use Vercel if you...

  • The site is a framework front end calling a hosted API or third-party services
  • Preview environments per pull request are part of how your team reviews work
  • You want firewall, TLS and caching handled without configuring them per resource

FAQ

Does Vercel replace AWS?

Only for the front half of a product. Vercel hosts front ends and functions; it does not rent virtual machines or administer a relational database for you, so the API and data layer still need a home.

What does Vercel cost after the free tier?

Pro is $20 per month and includes 10 million CDN requests and 1TB of data transfer. Beyond that, requests bill from $2 per million and transfer from $0.15 per GB, both shown on the pricing page before you upgrade.

How does AWS pricing compare at small scale?

The compute itself is cheap — t4g.micro at $0.0084/hr in us-east-1 on Linux — but a usable setup adds a database, storage, data transfer and possibly a load balancer, each metered separately. Compare that total against Vercel's flat $20 rather than against the instance rate.

Can one project use both platforms?

Yes, and it is common: the front end deploys to Vercel while the API and data live in AWS. The two connect over HTTPS exactly as they would to any other host.

What are the firewall differences between the plans?

Vercel includes three custom firewall rules on Hobby and forty on Pro, with 100 IP blocks on Pro and up to a thousand rules on Enterprise. On AWS the equivalent protection is a security group plus a WAF configured and paid for per resource.

Spot an outdated price or feature? Let us know and we'll verify it.

Heraldware analysis engine

reviewed · data sourced from official product pages · sources: aws.amazon.com, vercel.com