The first thing to settle: Integromat is the former name of Make. Searches for Integromat still land on the platform, but the product, pricing and domain are Make's - make.com - and this comparison treats them as one product.
TL;DR
Integromat and Make are the same product - the platform rebranded and now lives at make.com, which is why the name keeps appearing in searches. Make prices in monthly credits: Free gives 1,000 credits with 2 active scenarios, Core is $12/month for 10,000 credits, Pro $21/month and Teams $38/month. n8n prices in workflow executions and leans technical: Starter is EUR 20/month billed annually for 2,500 executions with unlimited users, Pro is EUR 50/month for 10,000, and the community edition can be self-hosted from its public source. Pick Make for a visual builder with 3,000+ apps and a generous free tier; pick n8n if you want to write JavaScript or Python inside the workflow, or run it on your own infrastructure.
Make's billing unit is the credit, and its pricing page explains that most actions cost one credit while heavier AI-backed features cost more. Free includes 1,000 credits a month, 2 active scenarios, 3,000+ apps, a 15-minute minimum scheduling interval and a 5 MB file limit. Core at $12/month for 10,000 credits monthly unlocks unlimited active scenarios, scheduling down to a minute, the Make API and 30-day execution logs; Pro at $21/month adds priority execution, custom variables and full-text log search; Teams at $38/month adds team roles and shared scenario templates.
n8n counts workflow executions regardless of how many steps each one contains, and every paid plan includes unlimited users, unlimited workflows and the full integration library. Starter is EUR 20/month billed annually for 2,500 executions, Pro is EUR 50/month for 10,000 with email support, and Business is EUR 667/month for 40,000 executions but self-hosted only. What sets n8n apart is that its source is public: you can deploy it with Docker, run it yourself, and write JavaScript or Python anywhere in a workflow. That is the real fork in the road. Make gives you a polished visual builder and a free tier that covers a small business's first automations. n8n gives you execution-based pricing, code inside the flow, and a path to running everything on your own machines.
| Feature | Integromat | n8n |
|---|---|---|
| What it costs | Credits, per action consumed | Workflow executions, regardless of steps |
| Free option | Free plan: 1,000 credits/month, 2 active scenarios | Self-hosted community edition, or a cloud trial |
| Entry paid tier | Core, $12/month for 10,000 credits/month | Starter, EUR 20/month billed annually for 2,500 executions |
| Mid tier | Pro, $21/month; Teams, $38/month | Pro, EUR 50/month for 10,000 executions |
| Top tier | Enterprise (custom price) | Business, EUR 667/month for 40,000 executions (self-hosted only), then Enterprise |
| Users | Unlimited users listed on plans | Unlimited users on every paid plan |
| Integrations | 3,000+ standard apps plus 350+ AI apps | Full integration library on all paid plans; nodes are open source |
| Code in workflow | Make Code App (JavaScript or Python), 2 credits per second of execution | JavaScript or Python anywhere in the workflow |
| Scheduling | 15-minute minimum on Free, 1 minute from Core | Execution-based; self-hosted scheduling is under your control |
| Self-hosting | Not offered | Community edition self-hosted via Docker with public source |
| Execution log retention | 7 days Free, 30 days Core and Pro and Teams, 60 days Enterprise | 1 day Starter, 5 days Pro, 365+ days Enterprise |
| AI features | Make AI Agents (beta), MCP server, AI Web Search, AI content extraction | AI credits included (2,300/month on Starter), native evaluation tools |
| Best fit | Teams who want a visual builder and a free tier that actually runs | Technical teams who want code, self-hosting or unlimited users |
Pick Integromat if
Make is the better starting point for non-specialists and small teams. The Free plan's 1,000 credits and 2 active scenarios cover genuine automations, Core at $12/month unlocks 10,000 credits with minute-level scheduling and API access, and 3,000+ apps are available without writing code.
Pick n8n if
n8n is the pick when engineering control matters: JavaScript or Python anywhere in a workflow, unlimited users and workflows on paid plans, execution-based pricing that ignores step count, and a self-hosted community edition whose source is public. Starter at EUR 20/month makes entry affordable, and Business is the only tier that forces self-hosting.
Both vendors publish their own ratings and community statistics. We did not collect or verify independent reviews, ratings or quotes, so none appear here beyond those vendor claims, attributed as such.
Yes. Integromat rebranded as Make and its product, pricing and documentation now sit on make.com. Searching for Integromat still leads to the same platform.
Each action a module performs consumes credits - most actions cost one credit, while heavier features such as Make Code App consumption are billed at 2 credits per second of execution. Error handlers and routers do not consume credits.
The community edition is free to self-host: deploy with Docker and access the full source code. The hosted n8n Cloud plans start at EUR 20/month billed annually for 2,500 executions, and every paid plan includes unlimited users and workflows.
Make Core is $12/month for 10,000 credits. n8n Pro is EUR 50/month for 10,000 executions, though a single execution can contain unlimited steps, so the comparison depends on how many steps your workflows chain.
Only n8n, and only through the community edition or the self-hosted Business tier (EUR 667/month). Make is a hosted platform on AWS regions in the EU and North America.
Make lists 3,000+ standard apps plus 350+ AI apps. n8n makes its entire integration library available on every paid plan and publishes the nodes as open source. Both cover the common SaaS tools; n8n's advantage is that you can extend a node yourself.
Spot an outdated price or feature? Let us know and we'll verify it.