← Heraldware
MakevsZapier

TL;DR

Both platforms now sell a free tier and then meter usage, but they meter different things. Make prices plans by credits: Free handles up to 1,000 credits a month with no time limit, Core is $9 per month priced for 10k credits, Pro is $16 and Teams is $29, all at the 10k-credit level, and its page states that a single action such as fetching a Gmail row counts as one credit. Zapier prices plans by tasks: Free includes 100 tasks a month with unlimited Zaps, Tables and Forms, Professional starts from $19.99 per month and Team from $69 per month, and its separate AI products are priced on their own, Agents Pro at $400 billed annually and Chatbots Pro at $160 billed annually. Make is cheaper per unit of automation volume; Zapier has 9,000 plus app integrations to Make's 3,000 plus.

Zapier's page starts with a free forever plan of $0 that includes Zaps, Tables and Forms with 100 tasks a month and unlimited Zaps, then Professional from $19.99 per month and Team from $69 per month. Its AI products sit alongside the automation plans rather than inside them: Agents Pro is $400 billed annually, shown as $33.33 per month, for up to 1,500 automated behaviours a month, while Chatbots Pro is $160 billed annually at $13.33 per month for 5 chatbots with 10 custom knowledge sources each and Chatbots Advanced is $800 billed annually at $66.67 per month for up to 20 chatbots.

The integration counts are the other axis worth knowing before you choose. Zapier advertises 9,000 plus app integrations and its MCP server is actively used, with the page counting 3.39M plus MCP tool calls completed and 450K plus agents built, and it documents connecting to assistants such as Claude through its MCP endpoint. Make advertises 3,000 plus integrations on its pricing page alongside its visual workflow builder, routers and filters, and an AI-agent builder that can also be driven by prompt. In practice the decision usually comes down to volume shape rather than integration count: a team running thousands of simple triggers a month gets a lower bill on Make's credit model, while a team that needs a niche app on the long tail of Zapier's directory, or MCP access from an assistant, is better served by paying Zapier's per-task rate.

Pros & cons

👍 Make Pros

  • Free plan at $0 with up to 1,000 credits a month and no time limit on the free tier
  • Core at $9 per month priced for 10k credits a month, giving a low entry cost for real automation volume
  • Pro at $16 and Teams at $29 per month at the same 10k-credit level, with Teams aimed at shared team workflows
  • An explicit credit definition: an action such as fetching a sheet row or Gmail data counts as one credit, which makes forecasting possible
  • Visual workflow builder with routers and filters plus 3,000 plus app integrations on the pricing page
  • AI agents and automations can be built visually or from a prompt, and the Free plan is positioned as a genuine evaluation environment rather than a countdown

👎 Make Cons

  • Roughly a third of Zapier's integration count, 3,000 plus against 9,000 plus, so niche tools are likelier to be missing
  • The Free plan's hard limit of 1,000 credits a month and a 15-minute minimum interval between runs make it unsuitable for anything approaching real time
  • Prices are quoted for a 10k-credit level, so the cost of higher volumes has to be read off the plan comparison rather than a simple per-credit rate
  • Credit consumption follows actions, so scenarios with many small steps burn through an allowance faster than the plan size suggests
  • The AI-agent side is described in product terms on the site rather than as a separately priced product with its own published rates

👍 Zapier Pros

  • Free forever plan at $0 including Zaps, Tables and Forms with unlimited Zaps and 100 tasks a month
  • Professional from $19.99 per month unlocks the full platform, and Team from $69 per month adds collaboration on shared automation
  • 9,000 plus app integrations, the widest catalogue of the two, including governed access
  • MCP server support with 3.39M plus tool calls completed and 450K plus agents built, plus documented connection to assistants such as Claude
  • AI products are priced openly and separately: Agents Pro $400 billed annually for up to 1,500 automated behaviours a month, Chatbots Pro $160 annually for 5 chatbots, Chatbots Advanced $800 annually for up to 20
  • Compliance documentation on the page, including SOC 2 Type II and SOC 3, GDPR and CCPA, SAML-based SSO and SCIM, and an AI model opt-out on the Enterprise plan

👎 Zapier Cons

  • Entry paid price is more than double Make's Core plan: $19.99 per month against $9
  • Task limits are the binding constraint: the free plan allows 100 tasks a month, so even light use moves you to a paid plan quickly
  • AI is a separate purchase rather than part of the automation plan, so an agent plus a chatbot can add hundreds of dollars a year to the subscription
  • Advanced AI products are sold on annual billing in the published examples, which commits budget up front
  • Governance features such as action restrictions, managed connections, AI guardrails and asset history are Enterprise territory

Side by side

FeatureMakeZapier
Free plan$0 with up to 1,000 credits/month and no time limit on the plan$0 forever with 100 tasks/month, unlimited Zaps, Tables and Forms
Entry paid planCore $9/month at the 10k-credit levelProfessional from $19.99/month
Middle planPro $16/month at 10k creditsTeam from $69/month for collaborative automation
Team planTeams $29/month at 10k credits, aimed at streamlined team automationsIncluded in the Team tier from $69/month
Usage unitCredits, where a single action such as fetching a sheet row counts as one creditTasks, counted per automated step run
Free-tier limits beyond volume15-minute minimum interval between runs on Free100 tasks/month cap with unlimited Zaps on the free plan
Integration catalogue3,000 plus apps listed on the pricing page9,000 plus app integrations with governed access
AI product pricingAgent and automation building described in product terms; no separate published rates on the pricing pageAgents Pro $400 billed annually ($33.33/month, up to 1,500 behaviours/month); Chatbots Pro $160 annually ($13.33/month, 5 chatbots); Chatbots Advanced $800 annually ($66.67/month, up to 20 chatbots)
MCP and assistant accessNot advertised on the pricing pageMCP server with 3.39M plus tool calls completed and documented Claude connection
Compliance and SSONot listed on the pricing pageSOC 2 Type II and SOC 3, GDPR and CCPA, SAML SSO with SCIM, AI model opt-out on Enterprise
Best fitHigh-volume, cost-sensitive automations on mainstream appsTeams that need the widest app catalogue, MCP access and documented compliance

Verdict

Pick Make if

Choose Make when volume per dollar is the deciding number

Make's case is arithmetic. Core is $9 per month priced for 10k credits, roughly half Zapier's $19.99 Professional entry, and the free plan allows 1,000 credits a month with no time limit rather than a trial. Because a credit is defined as one action, including a sheet row or a Gmail fetch, teams with many small steps can size their bill honestly instead of guessing. Pro at $16 and Teams at $29 keep the ladder shallow, and the visual builder with routers and filters is built for the multi-branch scenarios that consume credits anyway. The two things you give up are integration breadth, roughly a third of Zapier's catalogue, and the MCP and compliance documentation that Zapier publishes on its pricing page.

Pick Zapier if

Choose Zapier when the app catalogue and assistant access decide it

Zapier is worth the higher entry price when the integration you need is on the long tail, because 9,000 plus apps is roughly three times Make's catalogue, or when an assistant needs to call your tools: its MCP server counts 3.39M plus tool calls and its page documents connecting Claude in a few steps. Compliance documentation is also more explicit, with SOC 2 Type II and SOC 3, GDPR and CCPA, SAML SSO with SCIM and an AI model opt-out on Enterprise, which matters to buyers who have to answer a security questionnaire. Budget carefully for the AI products, though. Agents Pro is $400 billed annually for up to 1,500 behaviours a month and Chatbots Pro is $160 billed annually, and both sit outside the automation plan you were quoted.

What the vendors say, and what we did not measure

Neither Make nor Zapier publishes third-party review data we are willing to restate as fact, and we did not run either product ourselves. Every figure here is taken from the two vendors' own pricing pages as published when this comparison was written. If a plan price or credit definition has moved since, tell us and we will re-check it.

Who Should Use Which?

Use Make if you...

  • Teams running many short automations where the credit cost per action is the main driver of the bill
  • Anyone who wants a permanent free tier of 1,000 credits a month to keep small automations running indefinitely
  • Teams building multi-branch scenarios with routers and filters in a visual builder rather than linear Zaps
  • Buyers who want to see a low published entry price of $9 per month before scaling a programme of automations

Use Zapier if you...

  • Teams whose automation depends on a niche app that only exists in the larger catalogue
  • Anyone wiring internal tools into an AI assistant through MCP, where Zapier publishes usage counts and a documented Claude connection
  • Organisations that need SOC 2 Type II, GDPR and CCPA statements plus SAML SSO with SCIM on the record
  • Teams that want AI agents and chatbots priced and bought as separate products rather than bundled into a plan

FAQ

Which is cheaper, Make or Zapier?

On published entry prices, Make: Core is $9 per month priced for 10k credits a month, against Zapier Professional from $19.99 per month. Both have free plans, with Make allowing up to 1,000 credits a month and Zapier 100 tasks a month, so the free tiers are not equivalent either.

How does Make count a credit against Zapier's task?

Make's pricing page states that anything an action touches counts as one credit, giving the example of fetching a row from a Google Sheet or Gmail account data. Zapier counts tasks per automated step run. Both meters therefore scale with the number of steps your workflows execute.

How many apps does each platform integrate with?

Zapier advertises 9,000 plus app integrations with governed access. Make advertises 3,000 plus apps on its pricing page alongside its visual builder, routers and filters.

Do the AI agents cost extra on both platforms?

On Zapier the AI products are separate purchases: Agents Pro at $400 billed annually for up to 1,500 automated behaviours a month, Chatbots Pro at $160 billed annually for 5 chatbots and Chatbots Advanced at $800 billed annually for up to 20. Make presents AI agents and automations as part of the platform and prices them through the same credit model rather than a separate published rate.

Which works better with an AI assistant like Claude?

Zapier, on documented evidence: its pricing and product pages describe an MCP endpoint, count 3.39M plus MCP tool calls completed and give step-by-step instructions for connecting Claude. Make's pricing page does not advertise an MCP capability.

Can the free plans run automations forever?

Make's free plan has no time limit and allows up to 1,000 credits a month, but it enforces a 15-minute minimum interval between runs. Zapier's free plan is free forever with 100 tasks a month and unlimited Zaps. Both are volume-capped rather than time-limited.

Spot an outdated price or feature? Let us know and we'll verify it.

Heraldware analysis engine

reviewed · data sourced from official product pages · sources: make.com, zapier.com