← Heraldware
PlanetScalevsSupabase

TL;DR

PlanetScale sells a database: Postgres single node from $5 a month, Metal from $50 with local NVMe, high availability as one primary plus two replicas across three zones, online schema deploys and revertable migrations. Supabase sells a backend around Postgres: Pro from $25 a month with the first project included, 100,000 monthly active users, 8GB of disk and 250GB of egress before per-unit overages, plus auth, storage, realtime and edge functions, and $10 of compute credits that cover a Micro instance. Choose PlanetScale if you already have an application server and want only the database; choose Supabase if you want the database plus auth, storage and APIs under one bill.

Supabase layers a platform on the database. Free gives unlimited API requests, 50,000 monthly active users and a 500MB database on shared compute, with projects pausing after a week of inactivity and a two-project cap. Pro starts at $25 a month with the first project included and extra projects from $10, and meters the rest: 100,000 monthly active users then $0.00325 each, 8GB of disk per project then $0.125 per GB, 250GB of egress then $0.09 per GB, cached egress at $0.03 per GB and file storage at $0.0213 per GB past 100GB. Paid plans carry $10 of compute credits that cover one Micro instance; larger compute runs from $15 a month for Small to $3,730 for a 16XL with 64 vCPUs and 256GB of RAM. Team starts at $599 a month for SSO, SOC2 and ISO 27001 certifications and HIPAA.

The distinction is where the rest of your stack lives. If auth, storage and a generated API already exist - or the app is a traditional server talking to a database - PlanetScale's $5 node is the cheaper, simpler purchase and its online schema tooling is the feature you are actually buying. If you are building the application layer as you go, Supabase's Pro tier folds auth with row-level security, storage, realtime and functions into the same bill as the database, and the free tier is usable enough to start. Teams frequently start on Supabase and keep the option to move the database elsewhere, since Supabase states its stack is 100% portable.

Pros & cons

👍 PlanetScale Pros

  • Postgres single node starts at a published $5 a month; Metal with local NVMe starts at $50
  • High availability stated as one primary and two replicas across three AZs with automated failover
  • Schema changes deploy fully online and are revertable with zero data loss
  • SOC 1 Type 2, SOC 2 Type 2 and HIPAA listed, with purchase through AWS or GCP Marketplace
  • Non-blocking deploys, online version updates and online resharding keep migrations off the critical path

👎 PlanetScale Cons

  • No free tier listed; the $5 node is the entry
  • Billing varies with topology, storage, backup storage, network usage and add-ons
  • Auth, storage, realtime and APIs are not part of the product - they remain your application's job
  • Single node targets development and low-traffic production; HA is a step above

👍 Supabase Pros

  • Pro from $25 a month includes the first project, 100,000 MAU, 8GB of disk and 250GB of egress before overages
  • Free plan carries unlimited API requests, 50,000 MAU and a 500MB database
  • Auth with row-level security, storage, realtime, edge functions and a generated API are part of the same bill
  • $10 of compute credits on paid plans cover a Micro instance (1GB, 60 direct and 200 pooled connections)
  • Vendor states the stack is 100% portable, and compute scales from a $15 Small to a $3,730 16XL

👎 Supabase Cons

  • Overages are per unit: $0.00325 per MAU, $0.125 per GB of disk, $0.09 per GB of egress beyond the included amounts
  • Free projects pause after a week of inactivity and are limited to two active projects
  • Team tier starts at $599 a month, a large jump from Pro for SSO and certifications
  • Extra projects cost $10 a month each on paid plans, and log drains are $60 per drain per project

Side by side

FeaturePlanetScaleSupabase
Entry pricePostgres single node from $5/monthFree plan at $0 with 500MB database; paused after 1 week idle
Mid tierMetal from $50/month with local NVMe storagePro from $25/month: first project included, extra from $10/mo
Top tierHigh availability: 1 primary + 2 replicas across 3 AZsTeam from $599/month with SSO, SOC2, ISO 27001 and HIPAA
Billing modelNode price plus topology, storage, backup storage and network usagePlan plus meters: MAU, disk, egress, file storage and compute
Included platformDatabase only - pooling via PgBouncer on port 6432Postgres plus auth, storage, realtime, edge functions and generated APIs
Compute scalingNode size and replicas chosen in configurationCompute add-ons from $15 Small to $3,730 16XL; $10 credits on paid plans
Free tierNot listed; the $5 node is the entry50,000 MAU, 500MB database, unlimited API requests, 2 projects max
Schema workflowFully online deploys, revertable with zero data loss, online reshardingMigrations through the dashboard or CLI; 60 direct and 200 pooled connections on Micro

Verdict

Pick PlanetScale if

Choose PlanetScale if the database is the only thing you are buying

PlanetScale fits stacks that already have an application layer and need a managed Postgres with serious migration tooling. A $5 single node is a trivial line item, the HA shape is published rather than negotiated, and fully online, revertable schema changes remove the main risk from shipping migrations. You keep auth, storage and APIs in the systems you already run.

Pick Supabase if

Choose Supabase if you want the application layer too

Supabase suits teams building the product and the backend together: auth with row-level security, storage, realtime and functions arrive in the same $25 Pro bill as the database, and the free tier is large enough to prove the stack. The cost curve is usage-shaped - MAU, disk and egress meters decide the bill - so it rewards early-stage products and needs watching as they scale.

What the vendors say, and what we did not measure

No independent ratings or user quotes are reproduced here; we collected none for this pair. All prices were read from planetscale.com/pricing and supabase.com/pricing on 2026-10-13.

Who Should Use Which?

Use PlanetScale if you...

  • your app server already exists and only the database is missing
  • migration risk drives tooling choices and you want revertable online deploys
  • you procure infrastructure through AWS or GCP Marketplace

Use Supabase if you...

  • you are building auth, storage and APIs alongside the database
  • you want a usable free tier (50K MAU, 500MB) before paying $25 a month
  • you prefer one bill covering database and application services

FAQ

Is PlanetScale cheaper than Supabase?

At the base, yes: PlanetScale's single node is $5 a month against Supabase Pro at $25. Supabase's Pro tier includes auth, storage, realtime and APIs plus 100,000 MAU and 8GB of disk, so the comparison depends on whether you would otherwise buy those pieces separately.

Do both include a free tier?

Supabase lists a free plan with 50,000 monthly active users, a 500MB database and unlimited API requests, with projects pausing after a week of inactivity. PlanetScale's pricing page lists no free plan; the entry is the $5 single node.

How do the two price growth?

PlanetScale's cost follows topology, storage, backup storage and network usage on top of the node price. Supabase meters users, disk, egress and compute: past 100,000 MAU the rate is $0.00325 each, disk past 8GB is $0.125 per GB and egress past 250GB is $0.09 per GB, with compute from $15 a month.

Which handles high availability?

PlanetScale describes HA as one primary and two replicas across three availability zones with automated failover. Supabase's answer is a paid tier jump: Team at $599 a month adds SSO, backup control and certifications such as SOC2 and ISO 27001.

Can I move off either platform later?

Supabase states its stack is 100% portable. PlanetScale runs standard Postgres and offers managed migration support, with databases purchasable through the AWS or GCP Marketplace if your procurement prefers it.

Spot an outdated price or feature? Let us know and we'll verify it.

Heraldware analysis engine

reviewed · data sourced from official product pages · sources: planetscale.com, supabase.com